Question-led literature reviews
Focused clinical questions using PICO where appropriate, agreed sources, search approaches and selection criteria suited to the review type.
Evidence Reviews & Scientific Intelligence
Separate the signal from the scientific noise.
New information becomes useful when its relevance and limitations are understood. We organise evidence around a defined question and the next discussion or decision.
Structured extraction
Study design, population, intervention, comparator, endpoints, efficacy and safety results, and reported limitations.
Context and comparability
Differences in populations, designs, outcome definitions and follow-up examined to avoid unsupported comparisons. External validity and potential bias considered within commissioned methods.
Scientific and congress intelligence
Relevant public findings, emerging themes and treatment landscapes with clear source attribution.
Insight synthesis and gap mapping
Authorised inputs organised into traceable themes, unanswered questions and areas for investigation.
Conceptual workflow, not clinical data or a performance claim.
AI may support triage and extraction, with expert assessment of sources, omissions and context. Rapid scans are not systematic reviews. Formal systematic reviews, meta-analysis, HEOR and RWE design require separately confirmed scope.